How to cite:
Alexander Seran (2024) Reinventing Ethical Substance of Pancasila in Article 33 of the 1945
Constitution: a Study of Indonesia’s Actual Economic System Based on Honneth’s Young Hegelian
Concept of Social Recognition, (06) 08,
E-ISSN:
2684-883X
REINVENTING ETHICAL SUBSTANCE OF PANCASILA IN ARTICLE 33 OF THE
1945 CONSTITUTION: A STUDY OF INDONESIA’S ACTUAL ECONOMIC
SYSTEM BASED ON HONNETH’S YOUNG HEGELIAN CONCEPT OF SOCIAL
RECOGNITION
Alexander Seran
Atma Jaya Catholic University, Indonesia
Abstract
We observe social conflicts arise for a myriad of reasons such as politics, economics, and
differing cultural and religious identities. This essay is elaborated through a critical
interpretation of Indonesian political economy as it is written in Article 33 of the 1945
Constitution of Indonesia. It reflects Indonesia’s commitment to ensuring that economic
benefits are distributed equitably among citizens. Using Axel Honneth’s young Hegelian
concept of recognition by love, respect, and solidarity, Pancasila as a system of ethics can be
used to meet Honneth’s theory of moral grammar for social and economic conflicts
resolution.
Keywords: recognition, social conflict, Pancasila, moral grammar
INTRODUCTION
Cooperatives are cooperation or cooperation. Based on Law no. 25/1992, a cooperative
is a business entity consisting of a group of people whose activities are based on the principle
of cooperation/cooperation to drive a people's economy based on family. The definition of
cooperatives in Law no. 25/ 1992 reflects the views of one of the founding figures of the
Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI) Dr. (h.c.) Drs. Mohammad Hatta, that
cooperatives as business entities are a milestone in economic development and development
as joint ventures that use the principles of kinship and cooperation (Wulansari, 2017). Thus,
the conditions for achieving the goals of a business entity based on family and cooperation are
as follows (Ganie & SE, 2023):
1. Membership is open.
2. Democratic supervision.
3. Limited interest on capital from fellow members.
4. The remaining business results are divided based on the amount of contribution to the
cooperative.
5. Sales of goods are adjusted to the prevailing market price and payment must be in cash.
6. There is no discrimination in terms of ethnicity, race, religion and political sect.
7. The goods being traded are genuine goods, not damaged, fake or KW goods.
8. Members receive education on an ongoing basis.
JOURNAL SYNTAX IDEA
pISSN: 2723-4339 e-ISSN: 2548-1398
Vol. 6, No. 08, Agustus 2024
Reinventing Ethical Substance of Pancasila in Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution: a Study of
Indonesia’s Actual Economic System Based on Honneth’s Young Hegelian Concept of Social
Recognition
Syntax Idea, Vol. 6, No. 08, Agustus 2024 3551
The above conditions reflect the legal basis for cooperatives in Article 33 of the 1945
Constitution and its manifestation in Law 25 of 1992 concerning cooperatives as business
entities, Government Regulation Number 17 of 1994 concerning the Dissolution of
cooperatives by the government, Government Regulation Number 9 of 1995 concerning the
Implementation of business activities savings and loans by cooperatives, Government
Regulation Number 33 of 1998 concerning Capital participation in cooperatives, Minister of
Cooperatives and SMEs Decree Number 98 of 2004 concerning Notaries making cooperative
deeds, Minister of Cooperatives and SMEs Regulation Number 10 of 2015 concerning
Cooperative Institutions, Minister of Cooperatives and SMEs Regulation Number 15 of 2015
2015 concerning savings and loan businesses by cooperatives, Minister of Cooperatives and
SMEs Regulation Number 9 of 2018 concerning the Implementation and Development of
Cooperatives, and Ministerial Decree Number 22 of 2020 concerning Procedures for
submitting data on cooperative debtors in the context of providing interest subsidies/margin
subsidies for credit/financing for micro businesses, small and medium enterprises in order to
support the national economic recovery program.
The legal basis regarding the implementation of cooperatives as business entities
implies ethical reasoning regarding equality according to human dignity in cooperative
activities, including:
1. Membership is not forced. Therefore it must be voluntary and open.
2. In its management, cooperatives must be democratic.
3. Distribution of business results is given fairly according to the portion of each member's
contribution to the cooperative.
4. Providing compensation to capital providers according to the amount of capital provided.
5. Prioritize independence.
The embodiment of cooperatives as business entities in the form of primary or
secondary cooperatives. Based on Law no. 25/1992, Article 15 states that primary
cooperatives are cooperatives that are founded by individuals and have more than 20
members. Secondary cooperatives are cooperatives founded by cooperatives whose members
are also cooperatives. Based on the type of business, primary cooperatives and/or secondary
cooperatives can carry out the following types of business entity activities:
1. Producer cooperatives are cooperatives that provide facilities to producers to carry out
production. Products come from members and are offered at relatively higher prices and
then sold to members and non-members.
2. Consumer cooperatives are cooperatives that provide business activities in the form of
goods for the needs of members and non-members.
3. Service cooperatives are cooperatives that provide services (except savings and loans) for
the needs of members and non-members.
4. Savings and loan cooperatives are cooperatives that serve members and non-members by
providing savings and loan services as the institution's sole business activity. s.
Service cooperatives are cooperatives that provide services (except savings and loans)
for the needs of members and non-members. Savings and loan cooperatives are cooperatives
that serve members and non-members by providing savings and loan services as the
institution's sole business activity. The benefits of being a member of a cooperative are still
limited apart from the rights of cooperative members to share the remaining business profits
(SHU) based on the amount of capital invested and the amount of profit obtained by the
cooperative. Members can buy goods and services at more affordable prices than buying
outside the cooperative. Members can borrow funds from the cooperative using either a
conventional interest-bearing system or a sharia profit sharing system. Members can get
Alexander Seran
3552 Syntax Idea, Vol. 6, No. 08, Agustus 2024
entrepreneur training and expand their business network. In this way, you can develop into a
better person. The ethical foundation regarding cooperatives as business entities lies in
efforts to improve the quality of human life as both individual and social. The title
“Reinventing Ethical Substance of Pancasila in Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution: A Study
of Indonesia’s Actual Economic System Based on Honneth’s Young Hegelian Concept of
Social Recognition” is both intriguing and thought-provoking (Seran, 2017). It combines
elements of ethics, constitutional law, economics, and philosophical concepts, making it a rich
and multidisciplinary topic. Hannah Arendt's works (1972; 1990; and 2006) can be used to
sharpen understanding of citizens' rights and the state's obligation to protect and comfort
every citizen. Thus, recognition of the interrelationship between the state and citizens is
strengthened to prevent social conflicts or find solutions to the relationship between the state
and citizens as an inseparable whole.
Exploring the ethical substance within the context of Article 33 of the 1945
Constitution suggests a critical examination of how these principles manifest in economic
policies. Honneth’s Young Hegelian Concept of Social Recognition focuses on the
importance of social recognition for individual self-worth and societal cohesion. Applying
this lens to Indonesia's economic system could shed light on issues related to dignity, equality,
and social bonds. This title invites readers to delve into complex intersections between ethics,
law, economics, and philosophy. It promises a stimulating exploration of Indonesia's
economic landscape through a fresh perspective. Axel Honneth Kampf um Anerkennung : zur
moralischen Grammatik sozialer Konflikte (1994). Translated into English by Joel, A.,
entitled The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, 199.
Honneth’s exploration delves into the intricate dynamics of how recognizing shapes of our
interactions, identities, and societal structures greatly reflects the character of modern society
in stark economic differences: discriminatory, exploitative, and unfair. The unified world of
life is abandoned by economic competition for power in political leadership which
strengthens and perpetuates class differences. Emancipation is therefore a character of
togetherness in a multicultural world of life. Reinventing the ethical substance of togetherness
in the world of life is a condition and way to save democracy in practice rather than just
talking about it as lip service.
Like Habermas (1981, 1991, and 1996), Honneth (1994), Honneth investigates the
basic values of the life world in the view of Young Hegelianism as the ethical substance
underlying unity in pluralism and pluralism in unity. The basic values are love, respect, and
solidarity. Fulfillment of requirements is the principle of achieving goals. Therefore,
reinventing the ethical substance of Pancasila as contained in Article 33 of the 1945
Constitution is a requirement for practicing economic democracy to achieve national goals as
written in the Preamble to the 1945 Constitution.
The problem in this study is that social conflicts emerge from a complex interplay of
values, interests, and identities. Whether rooted in politics, economics, or cultural differences,
these conflicts demand thoughtful resolution. The conflict related to Article 33; 1945
Constitution raises the following research questions. What is the content, understanding and
implementation of Article 33, Paragraphs (1-5) of the 1945 Constitution. How to restore
political and economic praxis in accordance with the values of a multicultural world of life.
The aim of the study is to maintain life together in the unity of the nation state and her
sustainability in the future. Developing politics and economics by ignoring the conditions of
life world values will plunge the unity of the nation state into chaos and disintegration and
finally fail in sustainability.
Reinventing Ethical Substance of Pancasila in Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution: a Study of
Indonesia’s Actual Economic System Based on Honneth’s Young Hegelian Concept of Social
Recognition
Syntax Idea, Vol. 6, No. 08, Agustus 2024 3553
RESEARCH METHOD
The choice of paradigm, approach, and method depends on the research question,
context, and researcher’s preferences. Researchers often combine elements from different
paradigms and approaches to create a holistic understanding of complex phenomena. The
research methodology uses in this research is constructivism paradigm to understand the cases
of the contents and weaknesses in the implementation of Article 33, Paragraphs (1-5) of the
1945 Constitution. (Panjwani, 2017) in their respective works on the methodology of science
emphasize the same thing, namely, the importance of paradigms, approaches, and research
methods. The paradigm of this research is interpretivism. The approach used is qualitative
with a case study method for the implementation of article 33 of the 1945 Constitution.
Findings in analysis and discussion of the problem of this study may help in formulating the
conclusion as reinventing ethical substance of Pancasila practicing Article 33 of the 1945
Constitution.
The values of Pancasila which emphasize kinship in the implementation of Article 33,
Paragraphs (1-5) in the 1945 Constitution emphasize economic and political democracy to
prevent the arbitrariness of individuals, groups, or the state unilaterally controlling the
economy as stated in the table below.
Table 1. Ethical Substance of Pancasila in Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution
Pancasila (Five Principles of the Indonesian State)
Article 33 in the 1945 Constitution
1.
Belief in one (the Almighty) God
The economy is structured as a joint venture based on
the principle of kinship.
2.
Just and civilized humanity
Branches of production which are important for the
state and which affect the lives of many people are controlled
by the state
3.
Indonesian Unity
Earth, water and natural resources contained therein
are controlled by the state and used for the greatest prosperity
of the people
4.
Democracy led by wisdom in
deliberation/representation
The national economy is organized based on economic
democracy with the principles of togetherness, fair efficiency,
sustainability, environmental awareness, independence, and
by maintaining a balance of progress and national economic
unity
5.
Social justice for all Indonesian people
Further provisions regarding the implementation of
this article are regulated in law
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Kinship as the Principle of Social Recognition and Solidarity
Bahar (1995) and Dhakidae (2016) in their respective works show similar things about
what was done in preparation for the independence of the Republic of Indonesia. The
Investigation Agency for Preparatory Efforts for Indonesian Independence (BPUPKI), better
known as the Investigation Agency for Preparatory Efforts for Independence (abbreviated as
BPUPKI), is a body formed by the Japanese military occupation government in Java. The
Japanese military government, represented by the 16th and 25th Army command, approved
the formation of BPUPKI on March 1, 1945. This body was formed as an effort to gain
support from the Indonesian people by promising that Japan would help the process of
Indonesian independence. BPUPKI has 67 members, chaired by Dr. Kanjeng Raden
Tumenggung (K.R.T.) Radjiman Wedyodiningrat. The task of BPUPKI is to study and
investigate matters relating to aspects of politics, economics, governance, and matters
necessary in efforts to establish an independent Indonesian state. Pancasila was formulated by
Sukarno on 1 June 1945 in the first BPUPKI Session which took place from 29 May to 1 June
1945. The 1945 Constitution was formulated in the Second BPUPKI Session from 10 to 16
Alexander Seran
3554 Syntax Idea, Vol. 6, No. 08, Agustus 2024
July 1945. On 7 August 1945, Japan dissolved the BPUPKI and then formed a Committee
Preparation for Indonesian Independence (PPKI) with 21 members. PPKI reflects
representatives of various ethnicities in the Dutch East Indies region and played an important
role in the history of Indonesia's struggle for independence. Pancasila and the 1945
Constitution were accepted and established as the State Foundation and State Constitution on
August 18, 1945, the day after the Proclamation of Indonesian Independence on August 17,
1945.
Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution holds significant importance in shaping
Indonesia’s economic ideology. It serves as a guiding principle for the country’s economic
policies and practices. As the ethical substance of the 1945 Constitution, Pancasila is the
crystallization of historical experiences that are woven into a single region called Indonesia.
The brief description of Indonesia and her history are pertinent and relevant to understanding
and appraising what is happening as her present’s difficulties or problems.
Officially known as the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia is an archipelago country in
Southeast Asia. Indonesia's territory covers land area 1,916,906.77 square kilometers and
water area around 3,110,000 square kilometers with a coastline of 108 thousand kilometers.
Number of Islands is about 17,504 and often called the Indonesian archipelago or Nusantara
(Kompas (2020). According to Worldometer (2024), the current population of Indonesia is
279,798,049 people. Of the total population, 138,303,472 people are men (50.5 percent),
while the other 135,576,278 people are women (49.5 percent). Indonesia has a population of
around 3.45% of the total world population and her population growth is currently at a rate of
0.82% per year. With a land area of around 1,811,570 kms, the population density is around
153 people per km.
The capital city of Indonesia is Jakarta. Form of her Government is republic with the
head of government is president. State philosophy is Pancasila means five principles that
serve as ethical substances of the 1945 Constitution. National flag is red and white while her
national anthem is Indonesia Raya (means Great Indonesia). The currency of Indonesia is
Rupiah. The climate is tropical with the temperature 19-34C. Indonesia has 3 time zones.
Western Indonesia standard time is GMT plus 7 hours covers islands of Sumatera, Java, and
Madura. Central Indonesia standard time is GMT plus 8 hours, covers islands of Kalimantan,
Sulawesi, West and East Nusa Tenggara, and Bali. East Indonesia standard time is GMT plus
9 hours, covers the provinces of Maluku and Papua.Principles of Economic Democracy and
Political Democracy in Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution
In Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution, there are basic values as moral principles
contained in the Indonesian economy. First, Family Values in Article 33 paragraph (1),
namely, "The economy is structured as a joint effort based on the principle of kinship. This
shows the importance of cooperation and togetherness in managing the country's economy.
Second, the value of social justice for the state and which affect the lives of many
people are controlled by the state. Thus, the earth, water and natural resources contained
therein are controlled by the state and used for the greatest prosperity of the people. The value
of Justice emphasizes that the use of natural resources is for the welfare of all people.
Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution states the important role of Pancasila in Indonesia's
national economic system (Kompas Com (2021) as follows:
a. The principle of kinship in Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution rejects economic activities
that prioritize competition and individualism, so the entire economic structure, from the
national level to various regions in Indonesia, is based on the principle of kinship.
b. The principle of social justice in Article 33 Paragraph (2) and Paragraph (3) prioritizes
equality and rejects economic activities that are individualistic in nature. Therefore, the
Reinventing Ethical Substance of Pancasila in Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution: a Study of
Indonesia’s Actual Economic System Based on Honneth’s Young Hegelian Concept of Social
Recognition
Syntax Idea, Vol. 6, No. 08, Agustus 2024 3555
State has the authority to control important branches of production with the aim that all
economic components contained in Indonesian nature are processed and used for the
benefit of the wider community and the prosperity of the people.
c. The principle of economic democracy in Paragraph (4) requires that the Indonesian
economy runs in accordance with democratic principles which emphasize togetherness,
efficiency, justice, sustainability, environmental awareness, independence, and maintaining
a balance of progress and unity. national economy. In accordance with democratic
principles, the Indonesian economy must be regulated and obeyed as a law in accordance
with the words of Article 33 Paragraph (5), namely, "Further provisions regarding the
implementation of this article are regulated in law" so that it must be obeyed by all
citizens.
The data in the Fourth Amendment to the 1945 Constitution is interesting to discuss
regarding the ethical content of Pancasila in Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution.
a. Change in the title of Chapter XIV in the 1945 Constitution
b. Changes/additions to Article 33, Paragraphs (1-3) become Article 33, Paragraphs (1-5).
c. Explanation of Chapter XIV in the original text of the 1945 Constitution
Sukarno talked about Pancasila as five basic values that live in multiculturalist
Indonesian society, namely five principles named in Sanskrit Pancasila. As moral principles,
Pancasila values animate the 1945 Constitution and all legal products under the 1945
Constitution as the State Constitution.
Social Welfare is the title of Chapter XIV regarding Article 33, Paragraphs (1-3) of the
original text of the 1945 Constitution (before the fourth Amendment of the 1945 Constitution
in 2002). Social welfare is the goal of economic activities and Article 33 (1-3) is "condition"
of the possibility to attain the goal. Requirements in Article 33 (1-3) are antecedents which
must be fulfilled so that the objectives stated in the title "Social Welfare" can be achieved.
The determination of conditions for economic activities in accordance with Pancasila values
is emphasized in the Explanation of the 1945 Constitution as follows.
Article 33 states the basis of democracy, that economic production is carried out by all,
for all under the leadership or supervision of members of society. It is the prosperity of
society that takes priority, not the prosperity of individuals. For this reason, the economy is
structured as a joint venture based on the principle of kinship. Build a company that is in line
with that, namely a cooperative. An economy based on economic democracy, prosperity for
everyone! Therefore, branches of production which are important for the state, and which
control the lives of many people must be controlled by the state. Otherwise, the reins of
production will fall into the hands of someone in power and the people who are oppressed by
them. Only companies that do not control the lives of many people can be in the hands of one
person. Earth and water and the natural wealth contained in the earth are the basic principles
of people's prosperity. Therefore, it must be controlled by the state and used for the greatest
prosperity of the people (Stated in the Explanation of the 1945 Constitution) as follows:
a. The formulation of the title of Chapter “Social Welfare”
b. Building a company that is in accordance with the mandate of Article 33 of the 1945
Constitution is a cooperative.
c. Branches of production that are important for the state and that control the lives of many
people must be controlled by the state. Otherwise, the reins of production will fall into the
hands of someone in power and the people who are oppressed by them.
d. Companies that do not control the lives of many people may be in the hands of one person.
Through the Explanation of Article 33, Paragraphs (1-3) in the original version of the
1945 Constitution before the Fourth Amendment in 2002, the meaning of the requirements for
Alexander Seran
3556 Syntax Idea, Vol. 6, No. 08, Agustus 2024
achieving national economic goals, namely social welfare, is made clearer by prioritizing
Cooperatives as partners of State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN). Cooperatives as companies
created by the people are owners of BUMN as state business actors who are obliged to
empower cooperatives as partners to achieve national goals through the practice of political
democracy and economic democracy.
The Fourth Amendment to the 1945 Constitution regarding Article 33 with the change
of title in Chapter XIV to "National Economy and Social Welfare" the addition of Paragraphs
(4-5) without an official explanation as the original version of the 1945 Constitution has
caused pro and con opinions in the community. Here are some aspects that are often debated:
a. Ownership and Management of Natural Resources in the name of the state can hinder
innovation and efficiency. This assumption stems from their opinion that the private sector
may be more efficient in managing these resources. However, there are also supporters of
Article 33 who argue that state ownership ensures the use of natural resources for the
benefit of the masses wider community and avoid detrimental exploitation.
b. The role of State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN) is often the subject of debate. There is a
view that says that BUMN are often inefficient and too bureaucratic. However, there are
also those who argue that BUMN has a strategic role in ensuring public services and
economic sustainability.
c. State ownership of vital sectors can influence foreign investment. There are investors who
may be hesitant to invest in sectors controlled by the state. However, there are also those
who believe that foreign investment must be in line with national interests and people's
welfare as mandated by Article 33.
d. The Balance Between Public and Private Interests is an ongoing debate. There are those
who argue that Article 33 limits the role of the private sector too much, while there are also
other groups who argue that the state must ensure social justice and the welfare of the
people.
e. Some groups argue that Article 33 needs to be reformed to accommodate global economic
and technological changes. On the other hand, supporters of Article 33 argue that
constitutional values must remain relevant and protect the interests of the people.
The debate regarding the implementation of Article 33 reflects the complexity of the
challenges in managing the economy and natural resources in Indonesia. Therefore, a wise
and inclusive approach is needed to achieve prosperity for the entire community. Initially,
Article 33 in the 1945 Constitution was intended by the framers as Indonesia's economic
ideology regarding economic (democracy) sovereignty to complement Indonesia's political
(democracy) Independence.
The amendment to Article 33 in the 1945 Constitution is intended to strengthen
Indonesia's political and economic policies in accordance with national and international
economic dynamics. Thus, the interpretation of the Amendment of Article 33 in the 1945
Constitution into five paragraphs (1-5) must be changed along with the development of
history and economic thought in Indonesia. It means, ownership and management of natural
resources must be regulated in the interests of the wider community and avoid detrimental
exploitation. State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN) must play a strategic role in ensuring public
services and economic sustainability according to the principles of kinship, social justice, and
sustainability. Foreign investment must therefore be in line with national interests and
people's welfare in a balanced collaboration between public and private interests to ensure
social justice and people's welfare.
The amendment to Article 33 in the 1945 Constitution opens opportunities for
economic reform (from economic practices that are not in accordance with the mandate of
Reinventing Ethical Substance of Pancasila in Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution: a Study of
Indonesia’s Actual Economic System Based on Honneth’s Young Hegelian Concept of Social
Recognition
Syntax Idea, Vol. 6, No. 08, Agustus 2024 3557
Pancasila to economic practices that are in accordance with Pancasila values) by involving the
people in extractive economic sectors related to natural resources such as fishing businesses,
salt manufacturing businesses, businesses in forestry, mining, plantation, and animal
husbandry sectors. Extractive businesses have an important role in utilizing natural resources,
opening jobs, and increasing economic profits. Extractive economic activities that involve the
people will increase people's awareness of economic democracy and political democracy in
environmental security-oriented economic activities and community welfare-oriented
economic activities (Sutrisna, Kurnia, Siagian, Ismadji, & Wenten, 2022). This is important to
consider morally and decide politically, including:
First, how to use natural resources efficiently and sustainably by involving the
community in managing natural resources such as mines, forests, and plantations together
with the state or state-owned enterprises as the implementation of Article 33, (1-5) in the 1945
Constitution.
Second, how to implement economic democracy, which means the economy must be
based on the principles of togetherness, efficiency, justice, and people's welfare. In practice,
this leads to policies of income redistribution, protection of workers' rights, and more
equitable access to economic opportunities.
Third, how state ownership of strategic sectors can influence foreign investment so that
the involvement of foreign investors in state ownership can provide legal certainty for
people's welfare and sufficient stability for investment.
Fourth, how State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN) are responsible for managing vital
sectors such as energy, transportation and telecommunications can affect the efficiency,
quality of service and resilience of the country's economy.
Fifth, what is the balance between public and private interests in managing natural
resources? The private sector also plays a role in creating jobs, innovation, and economic
growth.
Amendment of Article 33 (1-5) in the 1945 Constitution is a manifestation of the
noble values or morality of Pancasila that in economic practice, Pancasila values underlie and
legitimize economic development to bring justice to all Indonesians. Article 33 contains the
economic foundations and management of natural resources to be conducted as follows.
Article 33, Paragraph (1) The economy is structured as a joint venture based on the
principle of kinship. The meaning of Article 33, Paragraph (1) is that the economic system
used and developed should not use competitive and individualistic principles. This verse can
be interpreted if the economy is structured from the national level to various regions in
Indonesia. According to Vlieks, (2022) the entire economic structure is based on the principle
of kinship.
Article 33, Paragraph (2) Branches of production which are important for the state and
which affect the lives of many people are controlled by the state. Article 33 Paragraph (3)
Earth and water and the natural resources contained therein are controlled by the state and
used for the greatest prosperity of the people. The meaning of Article 33, Paragraphs (2 and 3)
is that all branches of production from the earth and water which affect the lives of many
people can be processed and used by the state for the benefit of the wider community and for
the prosperity of the people. Control by the state means that the economy is not only
controlled by individuals or groups of people but must be used for the benefit of the wider
community and for the prosperity of all people. Therefore, control of economic resources that
concern the public interest is controlled by the state.
Article 33, Paragraph (4) The national economy is organized based on economic
democracy with the principles of togetherness, fair efficiency, sustainability, environmental
Alexander Seran
3558 Syntax Idea, Vol. 6, No. 08, Agustus 2024
awareness, independence, and by maintaining a balance of progress and national economic
unity. The meaning of Article 33 paragraph (4) states that the national economy is organized
based on economic democracy and other principles, such as togetherness, fair efficiency,
sustainability, environmental awareness, independence, and maintaining balanced progress
and national economic unity. This means that the economic system cannot be directly
controlled by the people, but can be represented by people's representatives, such as the
Assembly of People's Representatives (MPR), House of Representatives (DPR), Regional
Representative Council (DPD), and president.
From Article 33, Paragraphs (1-4) it can be concluded that the national economic
system is run through the principle of kinship, giving authority to the state to manage the
Indonesian economic system, by making economic democracy the basis, which is also
followed by the principles of togetherness, efficiency, justice, sustainability, environmentally
friendly, independent, and maintaining balanced progress and national economic unity.
Article 33, Paragraph (5) Further provisions regarding the implementation of this
article are regulated in law. The meaning of Article 33, Paragraph (5) is the establishment of
basic principles in managing natural resources and the country's economy, as well as directing
alignment with the welfare of the people. Further regulations regarding the implementation of
Article 33, Paragraphs (1-4) are outlined in the relevant law.
Pancasila Revives Hegelian Concept of Social Recognition
Honneth’s study of Hegel’s social and political philosophy is focused on the division
and development of the idea of reason and freedom as the guiding force of history. Honneth
shows that Hegel thinks of reason and freedom in two phases during his lifetime.
First, the young Hegelianism is Hegel’s early concepts about reason and freedom as
politically and religiously left. Second, the old Hegelianism is about Hegel’s mature concepts
of reason and freedom as dialectically fulfilled at the end of history as one and only
conception of truth about morality in the form of the State.
Hegel was influenced by both the empiricist theory of social contract and the Kantian
subjective theory of morality. However, Hegel offered a new understanding of history and
morality as the realization of moral choices in accordance with the law of the state. To this
extent, the use of Pancasila as the basis of natural ethical life fits Hegel’s initial theory of
moral substance, in which primary relations such as love, respect, and esteem in the family
are well thought-out (Seran, 2017). Therefore, understanding historical events cannot be
found in what historians collect in their writings about historical facts. The truth about history
is the Spirit itself being conscious of what is as it is.
Historians display the thing itself without dragging it before their tribunal and judging
it. Yet things are different in the history of philosophy. Pancasila is about the history of
philosophy regarding the foundation of a nation-State. The question about Pancasila is
therefore the question about what is the deed in the event of the emergence of Pancasila? As a
history of philosophy, Pancasila necessitates how it is to be understood? (Poespowardojo &
Seran, 2021). As a history of philosophy, Pancasila is not just the first sight as a matter of fact
but the insight.
Hegel explained in the Phenomenology of Spirit (Hegel, Miller, & Findlay, 1977) that
the historical development of civitas from its natural stage of ethical life to the state as the
objective and full realization of a society into a constitutional state (the universal and absolute
ethical life). Like Hegel, Sukarno spoke of Pancasila as five basic values that live in a
multiculturalist Indonesian society. The five principles in Pancasila can be accepted as the
basis of the Indonesian state which is being prepared for independence in BPUPKI. Sukarno
Reinventing Ethical Substance of Pancasila in Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution: a Study of
Indonesia’s Actual Economic System Based on Honneth’s Young Hegelian Concept of Social
Recognition
Syntax Idea, Vol. 6, No. 08, Agustus 2024 3559
believed that Pancasila was a philosophy that united and bound the entire Indonesian nation.
With Pancasila, the Indonesian people can unite on a solid and lasting foundation.
Hegel elaborates the historical development of the Spirit into four world-historical
epochs. Each epoch manifests a principle of Spirit and is expressed in a dominant culture as
shown in the following (Seran, 2017).
First, in the stage of childhood Spirit, the relation between subjectivity and
substantiality is unmediated. In other words, consciousness is in its immediacy. Hence
individuals have no self-consciousness of personality. They are still in external nature. The
typical governments of these cultures are theocratic and more particularly despotism,
aristocracy, and monarchy respectively. Second, in the stage of adolescent Spirit, the relation
between subjectivity and substantiality is mixed. Individuals have freedom and status. But the
relation of the individual to the state is not being self-conscious. This relation is unreflective
and based on obedience to custom and tradition. Hence, the immediate union of subjectivity
with the substantial mind is unstable and leads to fragmentation. Third, in the stage of
manhood Spirit, individual personality is recognized as in formal rights, thus including a level
of reflection. Here freedom is difficult because the universal subjugates individuals, i.e., the
state becomes an abstraction over its citizens who must be sacrificed to the severe demands of
a state in which individuals form a homogeneous mass. A tension between the two principles
of individuality and universality ensues, manifesting itself in the formation of political
despotism and insurgency against it. Fourth, in the stage of mature Spirit, the principle of
subjective freedom comes to the fore in such a way as to be made explicit in the life of Spirit
and mediated with substantiality. This involves a gradual development that begins with
reconciliation of inner and outer life and culminates in the appearance of the modern nation-
state (reflection of the philosophy of the state as it was taught by (Devereux, 2011; Gerson,
2017) in their books.
After previous development of abstract right and morality, society as the ethical life
develops into the family, civil society, and the state. As the synthesis of previous
development from abstract right to morality, the ethical life becomes Hegel’s main project of
setting up a philosophy of legal system to ground the existence of a constitutional state. Hegel
tends to over emphasize the existence of the state as the actuality of universal reason and
freedom and thus acts and speaks for the whole and the whole in their respective conditions
manifest universal reason and freedom. Only in the realm of state, the development of ethical
life reflects the logic of self-determination which is most clearly applied to the state as one in
diversity and diversity in one. This is the philosophy of the state.
Negative Dialectics and the Need for Moral Grammar
Dialectics in the state philosophy of old Hegelianism culminated in a strong legal state
that objectively determined politics and economics in the realization of general welfare. Marx
refused to use Hegel's dialectic in reverse and showed that the state is a false consciousness
that creates social conflict by perpetuating class differences between workers and those
holding political power and capital. Thus, the achievement of state life is not the result of a
positive dialectical process but a negative one because the state perpetuates social conflict and
must be destroyed. Honneth understands the difference between Hegel and Marx in critical
discourse as an effort to go beyond the Hegelian dialectic culminating in the recognition of
the state and the Marxian dialectic which aims to eliminate the state. According to Honneth,
recognition is a key element in the formation of individual identity and the constitution of
society. This theory identifies three essential forms of recognition: love, rights, and
achievement. Honneth expands Marx’s thinking about social conflict and inequality to meet
Alexander Seran
3560 Syntax Idea, Vol. 6, No. 08, Agustus 2024
Hegel’s thinking about recognition in creating a better modern society based on justice. For
Honneth, justice is the fulfillment of three elements in both Hegel’s recognition theory and
Marx’s social conflict theory. The three elements are love, law, and solidarity. His thinking
leads to a better understanding of how to create a more just society.
Honneth tries to revive the primitive stage of ethical life and makes it Hegel’s initial
attempt to bring mutual recognition as the ground of moral grammar in seeking social conflict
resolutions. This requires a methodology of reconstructive science with the power of
interpretation to capture what has been lost in both Hegel’s philosophy of right and Marx’s
theory of social conflict. For Honneth, recognition and respect underlie the life of a
multicultural society which can be used as a starting point for achieving a better life together
based on love, rights, and solidarity. In contrast, social conflicts are expressions of
unwillingness to accept views, beliefs, and behavior that differ from one’s own. Disrespect
and intolerance take form in hate speech, blasphemy, stereotyping, typecasting, etc. We
experience all of these in political and economic affairs that reflect the unwillingness of the
ruler who in some way dislikes criticism from public opinion. When violence is used to
condemn, justice becomes the only way to test what is right or wrong, then a system of ethics
after all be the foundation a system of law. Without a system of ethics, morality becomes an
abstract universality of the subjective reason in which basic values and social norms are
reduced into a category of dominant power whether it is economic, political, or cultural.
Living in a society needs an order which is the power of the ruler to make such an
order works for unity of all under his/her sovereignty. Once a society is in order, it works
through a system of norms that guides what is right to do and prohibits or avoids what is
wrong. After all, social conflict resolutions must be based on a legitimate power to enforce
social norms by granting rewards or penalties to the doers. However, mutual recognition is an
ideal moral principle to ground a system of ethics in which conflicting parties make
themselves open to respect the rule of law to gain by procedure what is equally good for all in
resolving social conflicts.
According to Honneth, Hegel offered a new understanding of history from the
philosophical perspective as the insight of a historical event rather than what historians dealt
with in writing history as a matter of fact (Buchwalter, 2013). Hence the philosophy of history
is concerned with pure thinking and so itself as science, i.e., not an aggregate of orders in
social and political history, but the development of thought, a development which is
necessary. Based on Honneth’s interpretation of Hegel’s philosophy of history, ethical
substance of Pancasila in practicing Article 33 in the 1945 Constitution will take a
reconstructive approach to Indonesian historical epoch. It demands an interpretation of the
deed of Pancasila can be equally developed along with that of the young Hegelian concept of
the struggle for recognition. Using Axel Honneth’s frame of a moral grammar, Pancasila can
be refreshed in interpretation to serve as the foundation of a system of ethics to work for
Indonesia as a modern constitutional state.
Honneth develops a methodology of intersubjective relations due to social and political
problems that frequently emerged in modern societies. For him, the laments of modern
societies on the problem of economic poverty take root in the absence of recognition and
intersubjective relations. This is why we need dynamic interpretation of Pancasila in the
context of Indonesian state administration and its relationship with the young Hegelian
concept of the struggle for recognition. According to (Yunadi, Faizal, & Septiyaningsih,
2020), Pancasila holds immense significance because Pancasila serves as the nation’s
weltanschauung, encompassing constitutional and cultural meanings. Pancasila’s dynamic
interpretation remains crucial for Indonesia’s present state of life. It bridges tradition and
Reinventing Ethical Substance of Pancasila in Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution: a Study of
Indonesia’s Actual Economic System Based on Honneth’s Young Hegelian Concept of Social
Recognition
Syntax Idea, Vol. 6, No. 08, Agustus 2024 3561
progress, embodying both continuity and adaptation. This is important to notice that the
struggle for recognition shapes individual lives, but the dynamic interpretation of Pancasila
shapes a nation’s identity in line with Honneth’s book entitled The Struggle for Recognition:
Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts (1942) In this book Honneth develops young Hegelian
concept of recognition in connection with GH Mead’s theory of the generalized other in social
psychology (Parkovnick, 2015). It is in line with what has been developed by Habermas in his
two volumes of the theory of communicative action (1984&1987) as well as Winnicott’s
theory of social relation (DeRobertis, 2010). Honneth’s recent publication is the entitled
Reification written as a critique on instrumental reason by calling on restoring of
intersubjective relation based on mutual recognition (Schmitz, Schmitz, & Chen, 2019).
Honneth’s focal point is that reification is rooted in social pathology as the consequence of the
decomposition of intersubjective relations, not only because of the structure of capitalist
economy as usually exposed by Karl Marx and G. Lukacs.
CONCLUSSION
Honneth tries to compose of historical deeds of world history to build a system of ethics
based on recognition, intersubjective relation, affection, and feeling of respect from which
social norms can be understood as moral grammar in acting and speaking about social conflict
resolution. For Honneth, understanding social norms in the modern constitutional state
presupposes what has been already in the family and developed into a public domain of civil
society. Affection can enrich intersubjective relations and hence develop self-esteem. Respect
too needs development from being natural in the family and civil society into formal
conception of the rule of law. Finally, solidarity concludes the power of affection and respect
for one to be able to place himself/herself as part of society, specifically when society needs
to struggle for the interests of all. It means that reconstructive theory of morality must be
placed into critical interpretation to make presence of those who have disappeared by
recognizing (Erkennen) them not only to be physically appeared but also morally existing as
autonomous persons who are able to act and speak as what has been always-already
experienced in the family. In short, Honneth’s constructive science of morality is possible by
critical interpretation about our current global education system. When the global education
system is failing to address alarming challenges to help us shape peaceful, just, and
sustainable societies, we need to stand firmly on lifeworld to make use of Pancasila as the
moral grammar for social conflict resolutions. Therefore, reinventing educational substance in
Pancasila may transform education by empowering learners not only with knowledge and
skills but with values and attitudes to be resilient, adaptable, and prepared for the human and
planetary well-being and sustainable development.
BIBLIOGRAFI
Buchwalter, Andrew. (2013). Honneth, Hegel, and global justice. In Global justice and the
politics of recognition (pp. 2347). Springer.
DeRobertis, Eugene M. (2010). Winnicott, Kohut, and the developmental context of well-
being. The Humanistic Psychologist, 38(4), 336354.
Devereux, Daniel. (2011). Classical political philosophy: Plato and Aristotle. In The Oxford
Handbook of the History of Political Philosophy (p. 96). Oxford University Press
Alexander Seran
3562 Syntax Idea, Vol. 6, No. 08, Agustus 2024
Oxford.
Ganie, A. Junaidi, & SE, S. H. (2023). Hukum Asuransi Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Gerson, Lloyd P. (2017). Aristotle and other Platonists. Cornell University Press.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Miller, Arnold V, & Findlay, John Niemeyer. (1977).
Phenomenology of spirit.
Panjwani, Farid. (2017). No Muslim is just a Muslim: Implications for education. Oxford
Review of Education, 43(5), 596611.
Parkovnick, Sam. (2015). George Herbert Mead’s social psychology. The American
Sociologist, 46, 294299.
Poespowardojo, Soerjanto, & Seran, Alexander. (2021). Pancasila: filsafat dasar Negara
Kesatuan Republik Indonesia dan roh revolusi mental: bahan pembelajaran ideologi
nasional humanis bagi guru, dosen, dan elit generasi muda. (No Title).
Schmitz, Volker, Schmitz, & Chen. (2019). Axel Honneth and the critical theory of
recognition. Springer.
Seran, A. (2017). Social conflict resolution and the need for a system of ethics. In Cultural
Dynamics in a Globalized World (pp. 714). Routledge.
Sutrisna, Putu Doddy, Kurnia, Kiki Adi, Siagian, Utjok W. R., Ismadji, Suryadi, & Wenten, I.
Gede. (2022). Membrane fouling and fouling mitigation in oilwater separation: A
review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 10(3), 107532.
Vlieks, Caia. (2022). Nationality and statelessness in Europe: European law on preventing
and solving statelessness.
Wulansari, Retno. (2017). Pemaknaan Prinsip Kepentingan Dalam Hukum Asuransi di
Indonesia. Jurnal Panorama Hukum, 2(1), 103116.
Yunadi, Frisca Dewi, Faizal, Imam Agus, & Septiyaningsih, Rochany. (2020). Pemberdayaan
Kader Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Dan Penanggulangan Anemia Ibu Hamil. Jurnal
Pengabdian Masyarakat Al-Irsyad (JPMA), 2(2), 144153.
Copyright holder:
Alexander Seran (2024)
First publication right:
Syntax Idea
This article is licensed under: