Legal Responsibility of Hospitals in Maintaining the Security and Confidentiality of Patients'
Electronic Medical Record Data
Syntax Idea, Vol. 6, No. 06, Juni 2024 2763
imagined as the intention of the action and therefore the action in question is carried out
according to the shadow that was first made. What is meant by forgetfulness is that the
defendant did not intend to violate the prohibition in the law, but he did not heed the
prohibition. In forgetfulness, the defendant did not heed the prohibition so that he was
not careful in doing an act that objectively causal gave rise to the prohibited situation.
According to Moeljatno quoting Van Hamel's statement, forgetfulness contains two
conditions, namely not holding a conjecture as required by law and not holding a
prudence as required by law. Forgetfulness is viewed from the perspective of the
creator's consciousness, so the forgetfulness can be distinguished into two, namely:
Realized forgetfulness and unconscious forgetfulness. There are two reasons for the
abolition of criminal penalties. (1) The reason for the inability to account for a person
lies purely on that person; and (2) the reason for the inability to account for a person
who is located purely outside the person.
In essence, criminal liability is the responsibility of a person for the criminal acts
he commits. It can be said that it is impossible for a person to be held accountable and
sentenced to a crime if he does not commit a criminal act. But even though he has
committed a criminal act, he will not necessarily be sentenced. The perpetrator of a
criminal act will only be punished if he has a mistake in committing the crime.
3. Criminal Liability of Hospitals as a Corporation
In his book entitled "Reviewing the Concept of Corporate Criminal Liability",
Adriano explained that hospitals are legal entities that also have a position as legal subjects
because they are both bearers of rights and obligations. As for the status as a legal subject,
hospitals as corporations can be legally insured with the postulates "Every person who
carries out and carries out legal rights and obligations, then he or she can be held
accountable for the implementation and implementation of these legal rights and
obligations” (Achmad, 2016). However, according to Adriano, RS as a corporation which
is also a legal entity (rechtspersoon) can be equated with a human being (natuurlijke
person) because they both carry legal rights and obligations (Achmad, 2016).
"A corporation, even though according to civil law, can carry out its own legal acts,
but it does not have a physical existence and therefore cannot act in real terms, nor does it
have an inner mind so that the corporation also has no intention to carry out any action or
deed, but by the actions of its managers (Achmad, 2016).”
"A corporation, even though according to civil law, can carry out its own legal acts,
but it does not have a physical existence and therefore cannot act in real terms, nor does it
have an inner mind so that the corporation also has no intention to carry out any action or
deed, but by the actions of its managers (Achmad, 2016).
According to experts, there are two main teachings that are the basis for justification
for being able to impose criminal liability on corporations, namely (1) the Doctrine of
Strict Liability and (2) the Doctrine of Vicarious Liability (Achmad, 2016).
Based on Article 46 of Law Number 44 of 2009 concerning Hospitals, Hospitals as a
corporation are legally responsible for all losses incurred due to negligence committed by
health workers in hospitals. Although the legal responsibility of hospitals to patients in the