How to cite:
Taufik Safi’i Abdullah, Suryo Handoyo, Erni Mulyandari (2024Pendekatan Lesson Study pada Kegiatan
Lokakarya Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka di SMAN 1 Lelak Kabupaten Manggarai, (6) Issue,
https://doi.org/
E-ISSN:
2684-883X
Published by:
Ridwan Institute
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BUILDING COST BUDGET PLANS USING
SNI AND BOW METHODS
Taufik Safi’i Abdullah, Suryo Handoyo, Erni Mulyandari
Universitas Tunas Pembangunan, Indonesia
Email: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
ABSTRACT
Building budget design (RAB) is a way to calculate the costs that will be required from a
building and with this cost the building can be realized as planned. In Indonesia, there are
methods for planning the unit cost price of project budgets, namely BOW (Burgelijke
Openbare Werken) and SNI (Regulation of The Ministry of Public Works and Housing
Republic Indonesia Number 1 of 2022 concerning Guidelines for Preparing Estimated
Costs of Construction Work in the Field of Public Works and Public Housing) where the
SNI method is an adjustment and renewal of the BOW analysis which is an analysis of
the legacy of the Dutch Government which contains a labor-intensive and conventional
work system. However, the reality in the field is that the BOW method is still widely used
for building construction work because the coefficient used is greater than using the SNI
method so that it is possible to get a greater profit. This study aims to find out the RAB
of the SNI and BOW methods and then find out the difference to be an alternative
reference in planning construction costs with the SNI and BOW methods and add insight.
In the calculation of the budget plan for concrete work costs for the construction of the
UPN Veteran Yogyakarta Integrated Research Laboratory Building using 2 methods, the
SNI method was obtained at Rp 9,659,059,280.45 while using the BOW method at Rp
14,474,237,708.85. The difference between the SNI and BOW method budget plans is Rp
4,815,178,428.39.
Keyword: RAB, SNI, BOW
INTRODUCTION
The Construction Project of the Integrated Research Laboratory Building of
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta has a building height of 34.32
meters with a total of 6 floors consisting of the ground floor, 1st floor, 2nd floor, 3rd floor,
4th floor, and 5th floor which has a building area of 7200 m2. The project is planned to
be completed in August 2023. The location of this project is located on Jl. Padjajaran
(SWK) No 104, Condongcatur, Depok District, Sleman Regency, Special Region of
Yogyakarta, 55281. Building budget design (RAB) is a way to calculate the costs that will
be required from a building and with this cost the building can be realized as planned
(Romadhona et al., 2021). The draft building cost budget is very necessary considering
the very large and extensive building that must be calculated very carefully and diligently
to minimize errors in cost calculations (Juansyah et al., 2017). SNI is an update of the
BOW analysis (Burgerlijke Openbare Werken) 1921, in other words, SNI analysis is an
updated BOW analysis. Qadir, (2022) said SNI analysis is issued by the Center for
JOURNAL SYNTAX IDEA
p–ISSN: 2723-4339 e-ISSN: 2548-1398
Vol. 6, No. 04, April 2024
Taufik Safi’i Abdullah, Suryo Handoyo, Erni Mulyandari
1574 Syntax Idea, Vol. 6, No. 04, April 2024
Settlement Research and Development. The costing system using SNI analysis is almost
the same as the calculation system using BOW analysis (Widiasanti, 2013). The
fundamental principle of the SNI method is that a list of material coefficients and labor
wages has been determined to analyze the price or cost needed to make the price of a unit
of building work. In 2022, the Indonesian National Standard (SNI) is updated again with
the Regulation of the Minister of Public Works and Public Housing of the Republic of
Indonesia Number 1 of 2022 concerning Guidelines for Preparing Estimated Costs of
Construction Work in the Field of Public Works and Public Housing (Nasautama &
Sitompul, 2022; Sarasanty, 2023). BOW stands for Burgerlijke Openbare Werken, which
is an analysis system for calculating building construction costs established by Dir BOW
dated February 28, 1921, number 5372 during the Dutch government (Sutirto, 2013).
BOW analysis can only be carried out construction processes that use labor-intensive
systems or work systems that use a lot of labor manually, which means only for simple
building work even though in fact in some parts of Indonesia the construction project of
shophouses as high as 4 floors is still mostly done manually labor-intensive (Ni’mah,
2022). At this time, labor-intensive systems are rarely applied because they already use
heavy equipment to complete them and only use limited labor (Pujantara, 2014; Rasuna,
2019). In fact, in the field there is a difference in a cost calculation between the SNI and
BOW methods, so to find out whether the building cost budget plan uses the SNI method
with BOW there is a difference in price and calculation, this study was conducted to find
out the difference in detail between the two methods.
The purpose of the research used as this final project is to find out the results of the
RAB for concrete work with the SNI method. Knowing the results of RAB concrete work
with the BOW method. Knowing the difference in RAB for concrete work with SNI and
BOW methods.
RESEARCH METHODS
The location of this final project research was carried out in the Construction of
the Integrated Research Laboratory Building of the University of National Development
of Veteran Yogyakarta, precisely on Jl. Padjajaran (SWK) No 104, Condongcatur, Depok
District, Sleman Regency, Special Region of Yogyakarta, 5528 can be seen in Figure 1
below :
Figure 1. Project Location
Sumber : Google Maps, 2023
Pendekatan Lesson Study pada Kegiatan Lokakarya Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka
di SMAN 1 Lelak Kabupaten Manggarai
Syntax Idea, Vol. 6, No. 04, April 2024 1575
Data Sources
The data in this study used secondary data. According to Sugiyono (2018: 456),
secondary data is a data source that does not directly provide data to data collectors, for
example through other people or through documents. In this study, the secondary data
sources are in accordance with the Manpower Law, books, journals, articles related to
research topics regarding the internal control system over payroll systems and procedures
in an effort to support labor cost efficiency. Data obtained from literature studies with
journals and interviews with workers or staff of the contracting company. Secondary data
obtained include (Umum & Rakyat, 2022):
a. Working Drawings.
b. List of wages and materials prices applicable in Yogyakarta for 2021-2022
(Yogyakarta Mayor Regulation Number 59 of 2022 concerning Unit Price Standards
for Goods and Construction for Fiscal Year 2023 and Yogyakarta Mayor Regulation
Number 70 of 2021 concerning Service Price Standards for the Yogyakarta City
Government in 2022).
c. SNI Analysis (PUPR Ministerial Regulation Number 1 of 2022 concerning
Guidelines for Preparing Cost Estimates for Construction Work in the Field of Public
Works and Housing).
d. BOW Analysis (Book by J A Mukomoko entitled Basics of Building Cost Budgeting
and Book by A Soedradjat Sastraatmadja entitled Budget Analysis of Implementation
Costs).
The type of research carried out is research that is a case study activity. The
researcher conducted a case study on the UPN Veteran Yogyakarta Integrated Research
Laboratory building construction project to examine construction costs, in this case the
author analyzed and recalculated the budget plan for the construction cost of the UPN
Veteran Yogyakarta Integrated Research Laboratory building using 2 methods, namely
the SNI method and the BOW method (Putra et al., 2022).
The research stage begins with the formulation of the problem containing the
problems to be discussed according to the title of the researcher, the literature review
contains related research and theories related to the title of the researcher Wolfswinkel et
al., (2013), data collection contains the data obtained by the researcher used to conduct
research, volume calculation to find out the volume of work to be used in the calculation
of RAB, RAB analysis of SNI and BOW methods contains calculations and RAB results
of SNI and BOW methods, conclusions and suggestions containing the final results of the
research and suggestions related to the research. For more details can be seen in Figure 2
below :
Taufik Safi’i Abdullah, Suryo Handoyo, Erni Mulyandari
1576 Syntax Idea, Vol. 6, No. 04, April 2024
Figure 2. Research Flow Chart.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Building Cost Budget Plan Using SNI Method
After obtaining an analysis of the unit price of work according to each type of work,
the next step is to make a building cost budget plan by multiplying the unit price analysis
of work by the volume of each work (Musyafa & Firdaus, 2023). To see the results and
more details can be seen in Table 1 and Table 2 below
Table 1. Recapitulation of Unit Price Analysis of Work (SNI)
SNI
No
Work Items
Unit
1
1 m
3
Concrete Works
m
3
2
1 kg Ironing Works
kg
3
1m
2
Formwork for Concrete Tread Foundation
m
2
4
1 m
2
Formwork Work for Concrete Sloof
m
2
5
1 m
2
Formwork Work for Concrete Columns
m
2
6
1 m
2
Formwork Work for Concrete Blocks
m
2
7
1 m
2
Formwork Work for Concrete Floor Plate
m
2
Pendekatan Lesson Study pada Kegiatan Lokakarya Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka
di SMAN 1 Lelak Kabupaten Manggarai
Syntax Idea, Vol. 6, No. 04, April 2024 1577
Tabel 2. RAB Metode SNI
Building Cost Budget Plan Using BOW Method
Just like the building cost budget plan using the SNI method in the BOW method
is also the same (Pangestu et al., 2023), but the analysis of the unit price of work
multiplied by the volume of the type of work is an analysis that uses the BOW system
which for more details can be seen in Table 3 and Table 4 below :
Table 3. Recapitulation of Unit Price Analysis of Work (BOW)
Table 4. RAB BOW Method
The Difference in Building Cost Budget Plan Between SNI and BOW Methods
After obtaining the final results of the calculation of the building cost budget plan
with SNI and BOW methods (Jangkung, 2023). Next is to compare the price difference
of each sub-work and also the total overall cost of the case study building for more details
can be seen in Table 5 and Figure 3 and Figure 4 below :
No
Job Description
SNI
Total
1
Pondasi Footplate & Pilecape
Rp 3.089.793.268,49
2
Pedestal Column
Rp 575.728.278,51
3
Sloof
Rp 1.425.187.072,34
4
Kolom
Rp 1.482.134.368,86
5
Beam
Rp 1.706.598.212,22
6
Floor Plate
Rp 1.379.618.080,03
Total of Work Cost
Rp 9.659.059.280,45
BOW
No
Work Items
Unit
Unit Price (Rp)
1
1 m
3
Concrete Works
m
3
Rp.1.430.175,00
2
1 kg Ironing Works
kg
Rp.43.149,70
3
1 m
2
Pekerjaan Bekisting
m
2
Rp.413.436,00
4
1 m
2
Bekisting Supporter Jobs
m
2
Rp. 386.657,00
No
Job Description
Bow
Total
1
Pondasi Footplate & Pilecape
Rp 4.981.039.612,69
2
Pedestal Column
Rp 883.939.618,01
3
Sloof
Rp 2.184.066.836,68
4
Kolom
Rp 2.181.792.423,90
5
Beam
Rp 2.304.363.878,78
6
Floor Plate
Rp 1.939.035.338,78
Total work coast
Rp 14.474.237.708,85
Taufik Safi’i Abdullah, Suryo Handoyo, Erni Mulyandari
1578 Syntax Idea, Vol. 6, No. 04, April 2024
Table 5. The difference between RAB SNI method and BOW method
Figure 3. SNI and BOW Recaptulation Diagram
Figure 4. RAB SNI and BOW Difference Diagram
CONCLUSION
Based on the results of research and discussions that have been carried out, it can
be concluded that the amount of RAB for ground floor concrete work to the 1st floor face
limit Construction of the Integrated Research Laboratory Building of the University of
National Development Veteran Yogyakarta SNI method amounted to Rp
No
Job Description
Difference
Total
%
1
Pondasi Footplate & Pilecape
Rp 1.891.246.344,20
37,97
2
Pedestal Column
Rp 308.211.339,51
34,87
3
Sloof
Rp 758.879.764,34
34,75
4
Kolom
Rp 699.658.055,04
32,07
5
Beam
Rp 597.765.666,56
25,94
6
Floor Plate
Rp 559.417.258,75
28,85
Jumlah Biaya Pekerjaan
Total work coast
33,27
Pendekatan Lesson Study pada Kegiatan Lokakarya Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka
di SMAN 1 Lelak Kabupaten Manggarai
Syntax Idea, Vol. 6, No. 04, April 2024 1579
9,659,059,280.45. The amount of RAB for ground floor concrete work to the 1st floor
face limit Construction of the Integrated Research Laboratory Building of Universitas
Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta BOW method amounted to Rp
14,474,237,708.85. The difference in the RAB of concrete work budget plan for ground
floor concrete work costs to the 1st floor face limit Construction of the Integrated
Research Laboratory Building of Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta
between the SNI and BOW methods, namely the BOW method is 33.27% more expensive
(Rp 4,815,178,428.39) than the SNI method.
BIBLIOGRAFI
Jangkung, S. (2023). Perbandingan Estimasi Biaya Pekerjaan Dinding Bata Merah
Dengan Bata Ringan. Universitas Tunas Pembangunan.
Juansyah, Y., Oktarina, D., & Zulfiqar, M. (2017). Analisis Perbandingan Rencana
Anggaran Biaya Bangunan Menggunakan Metode Sni Dan Bow (Studi Kasus:
Rencana Anggaran Biaya Bangunan Gedung Kwarda Pramuka Lampung). Jurnal
Rekayasa, Teknologi, Dan Sains, 1(1).
Musyafa, A., & Firdaus, I. A. S. (2023). Perbandingan Estimasi Biaya Pekerjaan Dinding
Bata Merah, Bata Ringan, Batako Dan M Panel: Indonesia. Ajie (Asian Journal Of
Innovation And Entrepreneurship), 1–4.
Nasautama, S. S., & Sitompul, M. (2022). Analisis Kebutuhan Tulangan Dan Tulangan
Sisa (Waste) Pada Pekerjaan Struktur Kolom, Balok Dan Pelat Lantai Pada Proyek
Pembangunan Pasar Baru Kabupaten Mandailing Natal. Portal: Jurnal Teknik Sipil,
14(2), 75–82.
Ni’mah, H. (2022). Analisis Biaya, Waktu Dan Kekuatan Bekisting Perancah Kombinasi
Kayu Galam Dan Tie Rod Pada Jembatan Box Culvert Sungai Hanau Cs Kabupaten
Tanah Bumbu. Universitas Islam Kalimantan Mab.
Pangestu, R. P., Manurung, E. H., & Hutagaol, K. (2023). Analysis Of The Budget Plan
For The Construction Of Freja House Bsd Mass Buildings Using The Bow, Sni 2008
& 2021 Ahsp Methods. Indonesian Journal Of Applied And Industrial Sciences
(Esa), 2(2), 245–256.
Pujantara, R. (2014). Struktur Beton Bertulang Dalam Perspektif Fleksibilitas Bentuk
Dan Arsitektur Plastis Pada Rancangan Dekonstruksi. Forum Bangunan, 12(2), 68–
72.
Putra, D. S., Selo, S., & Fauziati, S. (2022). Evaluasi Domain Manajemen Spbe
Pemerintah Kota Yogyakarta Berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Pan-Rb Nomor 59
Tahun 2020. Jiko (Jurnal Informatika Dan Komputer), 5(1), 54–61.
Qadir, M. (2022). Analisa Perbandingan Estimasi Anggaran Biaya Antara Metode Ahsp
Sni 2016 Dengan Metode Perhitungan Kontraktor (Studi Kasus Proyek Canal Wall
Strengthening Sorowako Kabupaten Luwu Timur). Journal Of Applied Civil And
Environmental Engineering, 2(1), 62–70.
Rasuna, T. Y. (2019). Analisa Perbandingan Rencana Anggaran Biaya Pembangunan
Mall Widuri Dengan Menggunakan Metode Bow, Sni 2008 Dan Ahsp 2016. Skripsi.
Medan: Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara.
Romadhona, S., Kurniawan, F., & Tistogondo, J. (2021). Project Scheduling Analysis
Using The Precedence Diagram Method (Pdm) Case Study: Surabayaâ€
Tm
S City
Outer East Ring Road Construction Project (Segment 1). International Journal Of
Engineering, Science And Information Technology, 1(2), 53–61.
Taufik Safi’i Abdullah, Suryo Handoyo, Erni Mulyandari
1580 Syntax Idea, Vol. 6, No. 04, April 2024
Sarasanty, D. (2023). Pelatihan Pembuatan Rab Kegiatan Prasarana Secara Sederhana
Sesuai Permen Pupr No. 1 Tahun 2022. Jurnal Edukasi Pengabdian Masyarakat,
2(3), 195–205.
Sutirto, S. (2013). Analisa Koefisien Biaya Pekerjaan Pembesihan Dan Cetakan Beton
Sesuai Penerapan Rencana Anggaran Pelaksanaan. Jurnal Teknik Pengairan: Journal
Of Water Resources Engineering, 4(2).
Umum, K. P., & Rakyat, P. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Pupr Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 Tentang
Pedoman Penyusunan Perkiraan Biaya Pekerjaan Konstruksi. Jakarta: Kementerian
Pekerjaan Umum Dan Perumahan Rakyat.
Widiasanti, I. (2013). Kajian Efektivitas Mekanisme Sertifikasi Tenaga Ahli Melalui Unit
Sertifikasi Tenaga Kerja Lembaga Pengembangan Jasa Konstruksi.
Wolfswinkel, J. F., Furtmueller, E., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2013). Using Grounded
Theory As A Method For Rigorously Reviewing Literature. European Journal Of
Information Systems, 22(1), 45–55.
Copyright holder:
Taufik Safi’i Abdullah, Suryo Handoyo, Erni Mulyandari (2024)
First publication right:
Syntax Idea
This article is licensed under: