Syntax Idea: p�ISSN: 2684-6853 e-ISSN: 2684-883X�
Vol. 3, No. 8, Agustus 2021
RELATIONSHIP OF ACADEMIC SELF-MANAGEMENT AND ACADEMIC
ANXIETY TOWARDS ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT OF FIRST YEAR STUDENTS IN INSTITUT
TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG
Rika Afifah, Aria Bayu
Pangestu
Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB) Jawa Barat, Indonesia
Email: [email protected], [email protected]
Abstract
Previous study has shown that
academic anxiety is associated to academic self-management, and it also has a detrimental
impact on students� academic achievement. The purpose of this study is to
determine the link between academic self-management and academic anxiety
towards academic achievement in first-year students at Institut Teknologi
Bandung using quantitative approach on 111 first-year students. According to
the findings of the regression analysis, academic self-management and academic
anxiety accounted for 21.4% of the academic achievement of the students as
evaluated by the Grade Point Average (GPA) of the students. Academic anxiety and
academic achievement appear to be significantly related; secondly, in terms of
academic anxiety, there is a significant difference amongst students with low,
moderate, and high academic achievement, according to this study. Students who
attain higher levels of academic achievement tend to have lower levels of
academic anxiety, and vice versa. The biggest component of academic anxiety
among first-year students at Institut Teknologi Bandung is anxiety-engendering
mental activity, which implies low student confidence and self-esteem. The
outcomes of this study can be used to support PeKa TPB Ministry of KM ITB in
developing a character development program for the first-year students.
Keywords: academic
self-management; academic anxiety; academic achievement; first-year students
����������������������������������������������������������������������������������
Introduction
College transition becomes a definite step in students'
academic path, because during this transition phase students are facing
circumstances in college that are different from their previous education life in
high school (Alipio, 2020). They are entering a
larger and broader environment with individuals from more diverse backgrounds,
as well as new academic difficulties. Students are entering the
phase of being an independent learner that are expected to be more mature and
responsible in taking decision for themselves. They are responsible to manage
their study without the teachers� supervision (Alipio, 2020).
The students are required to adapt
to their new surroundings and responsibilities that encountered during the
first-year of college life; nevertheless, (Shiddiq et al., 2020) noted that for many of the
first-year students, the transition might be challenging. The first-year
college students often encounter some problems such as anxiety, loneliness,
depression, and social withdrawal (Arjanggi
& Kusumaningsih, 2016). Changes in students' social and emotional aspects
have a significant impact on their anxiety along
with their academic changes (Sharma, 2012).
During the
first year of college, there is a noticeable rise in the
student�s anxiety. (LeBlanc & Marques, 2019). (Arjanggi &
Kusumaningsih, 2016)� explained that �majority of the first-year college students experience
anxiety symptoms that have impacted their adjustment academically, because of
this, these symptoms may be more
prevalent in first-year students. This validates the explanation of �(Douglass & Islam, 2009) that several research have
indicated that mental illness is greater among first-year university students
throughout the world. A student's adjustment ability becomes a significant
predictor of his or her academic performance (Shiddiq et al., 2020).
Before choosing and enrolling majors at Institut Teknologi
Bandung (ITB), first-year students must go through the Tahap Persiapan Bersama
(TPB) phase, which is a step of equalizing the fundamental knowledge based on
their faculty, which will then be studied more in the department later. The
first-year students at ITB are usually referred as the TPB students.
There is no direct self-development institution for the ITB
first-year students, since the self-development institution such as the
department student association (Himpunan Mahasiswa Jurusan) belongs to
the senior year students that already become the part of the department. During
the first year, ITB students are usually still in the selection stage of the
student activity unit, therefore the student activity units cannot be the
self-development institution for the ITB first-year students. Based on the
condition, Keluarga Mahasiswa (KM) ITB as student cabinet of ITB, has a
special ministry that is in charge of first-year students. The ministry is
known as Kementrian Pengembangan Karakter TPB (PeKa TPB), or the Ministry of
Character Development for First-Year Students. From an interview with the
Faculties General Director of the ministry, PeKa TPB is in charge of developing
character development programs for TPB students that intended to facilitate
them cope with the issues that arise during their first year at ITB. There
are several programs designed by PeKa TPB Ministry of KM ITB for the TPB students,
such as Ganesha Academy: Pioneer (GAP), Podcast Serial Pendidikan (PSP), and TPB
2020 Executive School. However, the programs continue to focus on student
activities, encouraging TPB students to be engaged in student organizations as
a method of character development, with just a few programs focusing on the
students' mental and emotional growth as a component of surviving in college.
The Peta Awan Survey was undertaken by the PeKa TPB Ministry
to examine the characteristics of first-year students at Institut Teknologi
Bandung. The findings of the student's characteristic analysis will serve as
the basis for developing character development programs for first-year
students. The survey was conducted twice, the initial survey was done before
the beginning of first semester and the second survey was done after the first
semester completed to see the changes in the preferences of the students after
studying in ITB for 1 semester.
Based on the Peta Awan Survey, the first survey revealed that
62.2% of ITB first-year students consider themselves to be easily anxious with
17.3% of the students consider themselves to be extremely easy to feel anxious.
The preference is changing after one semester studying in ITB, where the percentage
of students that feel easily anxious is increased to 70.3% with 29% of them are
extremely easy to get anxious. Students prefer to avoid circumstances that are
likely to raise their anxiety.
According to the interview with 11 student representatives
from various faculties in ITB, 8 out of 11 ITB first-year students perceived
that the high academic pressure, loneliness, difficulty in meeting friends due
to the pandemic, managing time ability, unsupported surrounding condition for
online learning, and even the tuition fee are influencing their level of
anxiousness. Some students even stated that mental health concerns were
interfering with their studying. (Kementrian Pengembangan Karakter Kabinet
�Arunika� KM ITB, 2020). Academic difficulties,
loneliness, and sleep disturbances are the characteristics that linked and
predicted students' mental health issues, according to (LeBlanc & Marques, 2019).
The Peta Awan Survey, which indicated a rise in students'
anxiety after studying at ITB, has attracted the attention of the PeKa TPB.
They attempted to address this issue by establishing the �Bimbel TPB� program,
a web-seminar (webinar) discussion based on the Peta Awan Survey's findings on
the mutual demands of TPB students. TPB students are supposed to gain insights,
tips, and strategies for surviving their first year of college through this
program. The themes covered in the Bimbel TPB seminar include academic and
social anxiety. However, according to (Hooda & Saini, 2017), the best method to minimize academic anxiety depends on which academic
anxiety components students are encountering.
Academic anxiety (Shakir, 2014) is a mental state of
unease faced by students in relation to their studies and academic concerns
such as working on academic duties, preparing class projects, and giving
presentations (Nasution & Rola, 2011). According to (Ottens, 1991), there are 4 academic
anxiety characteristics, consists of patterns of anxiety-engendering mental
activity, misdirected attention, physiological distress, and inappropriate
behaviors (Nasution & Rola, 2011).
According to (Shakir, 2014), academic anxiety until a certain level is necessary to keep students
motivated; nevertheless, high levels of academic anxiety might have detrimental
effects. It has been discovered that academic anxiety decreases a student's
learning skills and prevents great academic success. According to the findings
of study performed by (Nadeem, Ali, Maqbool, & Zaidi, 2012), (Shakir, 2014), and (Vitasari, Wahab, Othman, Herawan, &
Sinnadurai, 2010), academic performance is
influenced by the students� academic anxiety.
According to (Nasution & Rola, 2011), there is a connection between academic self-management and academic
anxiety, with students who have high academic anxiety having low
self-management. Similar findings were found in (Etiafani & Listiara, 2015) study, which revealed
that students with strong self-regulated learning likely to have less academic
anxiety.
Based on the phenomenon above, researcher aims to analyze the relationship of academic self-management and academic anxiety towards academic achievement of the first-year students in Institut Teknologi Bandung. This research also aims to find out the most common academic anxiety characteristic occurs among the students and to find out whether or not there is a difference in academic anxiety between students with high, moderate, and low academic achievement of the ITB first-year students.
Research
Methods
The research design is started
from preliminary study, problem identification, literature review, until
finding the conclusion and recommendation. The research design is presented in
the figure below:
Figure� 1
�Research Design
This study will employ
quantitative approaches in order to discover and establish the link between
variables. Quantitative research collects and analyzes numerical data to
describe, explain, forecast, or regulate variables and phenomena of interest (Mertler, 2021). The quantitative approach is applied
by conducting survey through an online questionnaire. The sample of this study
is 111 first-year students in Institut Teknologi Bandung 2020. The random
probability sampling is applied in defining the sample of this study.
The questionnaire is adopted from (Dembo & Seli, 2007) to assess the students�
academic self-management, and the questionnaire to assess the students�
academic anxiety is adopted from (Ottens, 1991). The Grade Point Average
(GPA) of the students from their first and second semester grades will be used
to assess the students� academic achievement and will be categorized into 3
categories of high, moderate, and low academic achievement.
The data collected will be analyze through statistical
calculation by using IBM SPSS Statistic Version 24. To assess the relationship
of independent variables (X1 and X2) and the dependent variable (Y), the
ordinal logistic regression analysis will be applied since the dependent
variable of academic achievement is using the ordinal scale with 3 categories.
Simple linear regression will be applied to identify the relationship between
the independent variables, and One-Way ANOVA will be applied to identify the
differences in academic anxiety between 3 categories of academic achievement of
the students. The categorization of academic achievement is presented in the
table below:
Table 1
Academic Achievement Categorization
Label |
Variable |
GPA |
Interpretation |
AA |
Academic Achievement |
GPA < 2.50 |
Low |
2.50 ≤ GPA ≥ 3.00 |
Moderate |
||
3.00 > GPA |
High |
Table 2
Academic Anxiety
Characteristics
Academic Anxiety Characteristics |
N |
Minimum |
Maximum |
Mean |
Patterns of Anxiety-Engendering Mental Activities |
111 |
1 |
5 |
3.843 |
Misdirected Attention |
111 |
1 |
5 |
3.132 |
Physiological Distress |
111 |
1 |
5 |
3.108 |
Inappropriate Behavior |
111 |
1 |
5 |
2.865 |
The table above shown that patterns of anxiety-engendering
mental activity is the most typical academic anxiety characteristic among the
ITB first-year students. According to the theory form Ottens (1991), patterns of anxiety-engendering
mental activity indicate that students are enduring worries that frequently
interfere with their concentration, portraying themselves as less competent
academically compared to other students. Worry feelings also discourage them
from posing questions since they are afraid of being attacked as incompetent by
their classmates. They are also dealing with maladaptive self-dialogue by
blaming themselves for making mistakes, and they are struggling to define their
self-worth, which leads to poor self-confidence. These circumstances make it
difficult for students to achieve well in their learning activities.
Table 3
Wald Test Result
Parameter Estimates |
||||||||
|
Estimate |
Std. Error |
Wald |
Df |
Sig. |
95% Confidence Interval |
||
Lower Bound |
Upper Bound |
|||||||
Thres-hold |
[Y = 1,00] |
-6.243 |
2.045 |
9.323 |
1 |
.002 |
-10.250 |
-2.235 |
[Y = 2,00] |
-4.405 |
1.996 |
4.871 |
1 |
.027 |
-8.316 |
-.493 |
|
Location |
X1 |
.029 |
.022 |
1.782 |
1 |
.182 |
-.014 |
.072 |
X2 |
-.096 |
.024 |
16.119 |
1 |
.000 |
-.142 |
-.049 |
|
Link function: Logit |
According to the ordinal logistic regression analysis, academic self-management (X1) is positively related to academic achievement (Y) among the ITB first-year students; that being said, academic self-management cannot directly foresee the students� academic achievement because there is no significant relationship (p-value 0.182 > 0.05). The implementation of a learning strategy cannot precisely define the academic success that students will accomplish. Students may attain high, moderate, or low levels of achievement despite of which and how many learning techniques they implement throughout their studies. This phenomenon might be caused by differences in the personalities of the students, preferences in learning, expectation pressures, and cognitive ability of the ITB first-year students that varied their motivation in the academic achievement approach (�ivčić-Bećirević, Smojver-A�ić and Martinac Dorčić, 2017) (Al-Sheeb, Hamouda, & Abdella, 2019). According to (Morosanova & Fomina, 2017), self-regulation indicators are interrelated to a diversity of students' personal attributes, and the amount and attributes of the linkage have a substantial impact on exam performance.
This study also
revealed that academic anxiety (X2) has a negative significant relationship
with academic achievement (Y) (p-value 0.000 < 0.05) of the ITB first-year
students. This means that an increase in academic anxiety is decreasing the students'
likelihood of achieving higher academic achievement. This result is consistent
with the findings of (Shakir, 2014) study, which discovered an inverse
connection between academic anxiety and academic achievement. The logit
function calculation for the link between academic anxiety and academic
achievement is as follows:
Therefore, P2 =
The
constants and regression coefficient of the academic anxiety variable both are
negative, indicating that the independent and dependent variables are inversely
linked. Academic achievement starts to decrease when a student's academic
anxiety increases. Every 1% increase in academic anxiety increases the
likelihood of a student achieving low academic achievement by 0.00177% and
decreases the likelihood of achieving good academic achievement by 0.0129%.
The
relationship of independent variables (X1 & X2) simultaneously towards the
dependent variable is presented in the table below:
Table 4
Coefficient Determination
Pseudo R-Square |
|
Cox and Snell |
.175 |
Nagelkerke |
.214 |
McFadden |
.113 |
Link function: Logit. |
Academic self-management and academic anxiety both have an impact on ITB first-year students' overall academic achievement by 21.4%. This indicates that strong academic self-management and academic anxiety have a considerable amount in predicting students' academic achievement to the optimum level. Furthermore, the other 78.6% of the academic achievement is impacted by the variables that could be come from the students� internal or external factors that are not mentioned in this research.
Table 5
Simple Linear Regression Coefficient Result
Coefficientsa |
||||||
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
t |
Sig. |
||
B |
Std. Error |
Beta |
||||
1 |
(Constant) |
66.947 |
6.160 |
|
10.867 |
.000 |
A. Self-Management |
-.167 |
.102 |
-.155 |
-1.640 |
.104 |
|
a. Dependent Variable:
A. Anxiety |
Based on the table 5, the academic self-management to
academic anxiety regression coefficient is -0.167, indicating that academic
self-management is adversely connected to academic anxiety, with a 1 increase in
academic self-management reducing academic anxiety by 0.167. However, the
relationship of both variables is not significant since the significnt value is
0.104 (>0.05).
Among the ITB first-year students, having a good
academic self-management does not necessarily resulting in have a low academic
anxiety. In other words, academic anxiety among first-year Institut Teknologi
Bandung students cannot be determined by the student's academic-self
management. The result contradicts the findings of (Nasution & Rola, 2011)
who discovered a moderately significant relationship between academic
self-management and academic anxiety. Nevertheless, both researches found a
negative relationship between academic self-management and academic
anxiety. The PeKa TPB Ministry identified the tuition fee, loneliness, lack of
peer support, and academic pressure as the top causes of anxiety among the
first-year students in ITB. �
Table 6
One-Way ANOVA Descriptive
Result
Descriptives |
||||||||
A. Anxiety |
||||||||
|
N |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Std. Error |
95% Confidence Interval for Mean |
Minimum |
Maximum |
|
Lower Bound |
Upper Bound |
|||||||
Low |
11 |
67.7883 |
7.29942 |
2.20086 |
62.8845 |
72.6921 |
52.62 |
76.59 |
Moderate |
28 |
59.5286 |
7.88168 |
1.48950 |
56.4724 |
62.5848 |
42.81 |
76.63 |
High |
72 |
54.3201 |
10.03721 |
1.18290 |
51.9614 |
56.6787 |
28.82 |
74.89 |
Total |
111 |
56.9686 |
10.15305 |
.96369 |
55.0588 |
58.8784 |
28.82 |
76.63 |
The mean scores in the table above show that the lower the academic
anxiety, the higher the academic achievement. Academic anxiety is higher among
students with lower academic achievement than those with higher achievement.
Table 7
One-Way ANOVA Result
ANOVA |
|||||
A. Anxiety |
|||||
|
Sum of Squares |
Df |
Mean Square |
F |
Sig. |
Between Groups |
1976.280 |
2 |
988.140 |
11.398 |
.000 |
Within Groups |
9363.015 |
108 |
86.695 |
|
|
Total |
11339.295 |
110 |
|
|
|
The significant value in the table above is 0.000 < (0.05), reflecting a significant difference in academic anxiety between students with low, moderate, and high academic achievement. The students with higher academic anxiety achieve lower in their academic because they have a poorer capability to manage their attention span, focus, memory, and managing distraction (Mirawdali, Morrissey and Ball, 2018) (Jannata and Nur�aeni, 2020). According to (Adesola & Li, 2018), anxiety is one of the primary emotions related with students' academic performance.
Conclusion
Academic anxiety is most prevalent among first-year college
students, and it can have a negative impact on their academic achievement.
Academic anxiety, at a certain amount, can enhance students' motivation;
nevertheless, excessive academic anxiety has a detrimental impact on students'
performance. Academic self-management, in addition to academic anxiety, plays a
supportive role in shaping a student's academic achievement.
BIBLIOGRAFI
Adesola, Shakirat Abimbola, & Li,
Yongmin. (2018). The relationship between self-regulation, self-efficacy, test
anxiety and motivation. International Journal of Information and Education
Technology, 8(10), 759�763.Google Scholar
Al-Sheeb, Bothaina A., Hamouda, A. M.,
& Abdella, Galal M. (2019). Modeling of student academic achievement in
engineering education using cognitive and non-cognitive factors. Journal of
Applied Research in Higher Education, 11(2), 178�198. Google Scholar
Alipio, Mark. (2020). Adjustment to
college and academic performance: Insights from Filipino college freshmen in an
allied health science course. (January). Google
Scholar
Arjanggi, Ruseno, & Kusumaningsih, Luh
Putu S. (2016). College Adjustment of First Year Students: The Role of Social
Anxiety. Journal of Educational, Health and Community Psychology, 5(1),
30. Google
Scholar
Dembo, Myron H., & Seli, Helena.
(2007). Academic Self-Management. In Motivation and Learning Strategies for
College Success: A Self-Management Approach (3rd ed., pp. 3�28). New York:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Incorporated. Google
Scholar
Douglass, Libbie, & Islam, Mir Rabiul.
(2009). Emotional wellbeing of first year university students : Critical
for determining future academic success . First Year in Higher Education
Conference, 1�10. Google
Scholar
Etiafani, Etiafani, & Listiara, Anita.
(2015). Self-Regulated Learning dan kecemasan akademik pada siswa SMK. Jurnal
Empati, 4(4), 144�149. Google
Scholar
Hooda, Madhuri, & Saini, Anu. (2017).
Academic Anxiety: An Overview. Educational Quest: An Int. J. of Education and
Applied Social Science, 8(3), 807�810. Google
Scholar
Jannata, Ainun Hasri, & Nur�aeni.
(2020). Academic Anxiety In Students : A Systematic Review. Future
Psychology Interaction of Human Behavior, Culture, and Technology to Create
Society 5.0, (2015). Google
Scholar
Kementrian Pengembangan Karakter Kabinet
�Arunika� KM ITB. (2020). Dokumen Analisis Karakteristik TPB 2020.
LeBlanc, Nicole, & Marques, Luana.
(2019). Anxiety in college: What we know and how to cope - Harvard Health Blog
- Harvard Health Publishing. Google
Scholar
Mertler, Craig A. (2021). Introduction to
educational research. Sage publications. Google Scholar
Mirawdali, Shangal, Morrissey, Hana, &
Ball, Patrick. (2018). Academic anxiety and its effects on academic
performance. International Journal of Current Research, 10(6),
70017�70026. Google
Scholar
Morosanova, V. I., & Fomina, T. G.
(2017). Self-regulation as a Mediator in the Relationship between Anxiety and
Academic Examination Performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,
237, 1066�1070. Google
Scholar
Nadeem, Mohammad, Ali, Akhtar, Maqbool,
Saira, & Zaidi, Syeda Uzma. (2012). Impact of Anxiety on the Academic
Achievement of Students Having Different Mental Abilities at University level in
Bahawalpur (Southern Punjab) Pakistan. International Online Journal of
Educational Sciences, 4(3), 519�528. Google
Scholar
Nasution, Liza Harlini, & Rola, Fasti.
(2011). Hubungan Antara Kecemasan Akademik Dengan Academic Self Management Pada
Siswa Sma Kelas X Unggulan. Jurnal Psikologi Universitas Sumatra Utara. Google
Scholar
Ottens, Allen J. (1991). Is Academic
Anxiety a Problem for You? In Coping with Academic Anxiety (pp. 1�13).
The Rosen Publishing Group. Google
Scholar
Shakir, Mohd. (2014). Academic Anxiety as a
Correlate of Academic Achievement. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(10),
29�37. Google Scholar
Sharma, Bharti. (2012). Adjustment and
Emotional Maturity Among First Year College Students. Pakistan Journal of
Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(3), 32�37.
Google
Scholar
Shiddiq, Muhammad Imam, Fitra, Malika A.,
Patricia, Ruth, Afriani, Damara I., Bahar, Fironika A., & Malay, Elok D.
(2020). Social Support is Positively Correlated With College Adjustment in
First-Year Students. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities
Research, 494(Iciap 2019), 549�558. Google
Scholar
Vitasari, Prima, Wahab, Muhammad Nubli Abdul,
Othman, Ahmad, Herawan, Tutut, & Sinnadurai, Suriya Kumar. (2010). The
relationship between study anxiety and academic performance among engineering
students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8(5),
490�497. Google
Scholar
�ivčić-Bećirević, Ivanka, Smojver-A�ić, Sanja, &
Martinac Dorčić, Tamara. (2017). Predictors of University Students �
Academic Achievement : Journal for General Social Issues, 26(4).
Google
Scholar
Rika Afifah (2021) |
First publication right: |
This article is licensed under: |